Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Provide Recommended Vision Services

Springfield, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that vision services were provided as recommended by a vision specialist for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and subdural hemorrhage. Medical record review showed that the resident was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for mobility and activities of daily living. An eye exam documented a recommendation for cataract surgery and an ophthalmology consult, with a follow-up visit to occur in five to six months. However, there was no documentation in the medical record of any follow-up regarding the cataract surgery or subsequent eye provider visits. The resident's care plan did not include information about vision impairment or the recommended follow-up for the cataract procedure. Interviews with the resident's family and facility staff confirmed that no evidence existed of staff arranging or following up on the recommended ophthalmology consult or follow-up appointments. Facility policy required the social services department to make necessary referrals for eye care services, but this was not documented as completed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙