Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Maintain Clear Documentation of Advance Directives

Springfield, Ohio Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents' advance directives were clearly maintained and accurately documented in their medical records. For two residents with complex medical histories, including conditions such as diabetes, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, multiple sclerosis, and respiratory failure, there were inconsistencies in the documentation of their code status. In both cases, the residents' paper charts contained conflicting documents: one indicating Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) and another, signed by a physician, indicating Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care-Arrest (DNRCC-A). During interviews, the Divisional Director of Clinical Operations confirmed the presence of both DNRCC and DNRCC-A documents in the residents' charts. Facility policy required that copies of advance directives be placed in the hard chart medical record, and defined the differences between DNRCC and DNRCC-A. However, the presence of both types of documentation for each resident created ambiguity regarding the residents' actual code status, demonstrating a failure to maintain clear and consistent records as required by facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙