Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Protect Resident Privacy and Confidentiality

Cincinnati, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of residents' personal and medical information, affecting three residents. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses, the facility posted the resident's picture on social media without obtaining written consent from the resident or their representative, despite the representative's explicit request not to do so. The facility's policy required explicit written consent prior to releasing or transmitting resident images, which was not followed in this case. Another resident, also with severe cognitive impairment, was provided incontinence care by staff without the window curtain being closed, exposing the resident to potential view from the staff parking lot. Staff confirmed the curtain should have been drawn to ensure visual privacy. In a separate incident, a resident with Alzheimer's disease and other conditions had her blood sugar checked by an RN in the dining room in the presence of other residents, without visual privacy or obtaining consent. These actions were in direct violation of the facility's policies and residents' rights to privacy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙