Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Maintain Clear and Accessible Advance Directives

Lakewood, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directives were clear and easily accessible to staff. Specifically, the medical record for a resident with a history of kidney transplant complications, end stage kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus showed inconsistencies regarding code status. The hospital paperwork indicated the resident was to be Full code, while the advance directive form in the facility's records had DNRCCA selected and was signed by a physician but not dated. Additionally, the form had a hospital sticker, further complicating the clarity of the resident's code status. Interviews with staff and the resident's family confirmed the confusion, as the Corporate Registered Nurse acknowledged the presence of both a Full code hospital document and an undated DNRCCA form. The facility's policy required staff to check the chart for code status, but the lack of a dated, clearly documented directive led to uncertainty. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and affected one resident out of three reviewed for advance directives.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙