Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Documentation of Advance Directive (Code Status)

Greensboro, North Carolina Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain consistent and accurate documentation of a resident's advance directive (code status) across both the electronic medical record (EMR) and the paper record kept at the nursing station. For one resident with a history of heart failure, renal insufficiency, and respiratory failure, the paper binder at the nursing station contained a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form, while the EMR and physician orders indicated a Full Code status. The care plan and recent assessments also reflected the Full Code status, despite the presence of the DNR form in the paper record. Interviews with facility staff revealed that both the EMR and the paper binder were used as sources for code status information, and staff expected these sources to match. Nursing staff and management acknowledged the discrepancy when it was brought to their attention, confirming that the two records did not align for this resident. The resident was noted to have moderately impaired cognition at the time of the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙