Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0711
D

Failure to Review and Assess Plan of Care for Resident with New PVD Diagnosis

Durham, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

Fine: $15,816
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director reviewed the total plan of care and conducted an appropriate assessment for a resident newly diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The resident, who had a history of diabetes mellitus, dementia, multiple contractures, malnutrition, hemiplegia, and PVD, was severely cognitively impaired and unable to make decisions independently. A podiatrist had previously documented absent pedal pulses, delayed capillary refill, and pigmentary changes in both feet, and diagnosed the resident with PVD, recommending routine or at-risk foot care but not vascular surgery referral. Despite these findings, the Medical Director did not examine the resident's feet or assess pedal pulses during a subsequent visit and was unaware of the podiatrist's consultation and the new PVD diagnosis. Nursing staff could not confirm whether the Medical Director had been notified of the podiatrist's findings or the new diagnosis. The Medical Director's progress notes did not address the recent PVD diagnosis or include a follow-up plan, indicating a lack of communication and review of the resident's updated care needs.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙