Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Code MDS for Active PVD Diagnosis

Durham, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

Fine: $15,816
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident who had an active diagnosis of peripheral vascular disease (PVD). The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, dementia, contractures, protein malnutrition, and hemiplegia, was given a new diagnosis of PVD by a podiatrist following a clinical assessment that identified classic signs and symptoms of the disease. Despite this, the quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect the new diagnosis of PVD. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the process for updating diagnoses involved the Social Service Coordinator receiving and distributing consultation notes, which were then uploaded into the electronic health record. However, the MDS nurses were unaware of the new PVD diagnosis and did not code it on the resident's MDS, stating that they review medical records and consultations for new information. The MDS nurses believed that not coding the diagnosis was accurate, despite the documented evidence and clinical findings supporting the presence of PVD.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙