Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Failure to Accurately Code Hospice Status on MDS Assessments

Garner, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-12-2025

Penalty

Fine: $23,100
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in the area of hospice care for two residents. For the first resident, who had diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, chronic diastolic heart failure, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, the care plan and physician orders indicated she was receiving hospice services. However, her quarterly MDS did not reflect her hospice status. Interviews with the MDS Nurse, Director of Nursing (DON), and Administrator confirmed that this was an oversight and that the MDS should have indicated hospice care. Similarly, the second resident, diagnosed with dementia and hypertensive heart disease, was also receiving hospice services as documented in her care plan and physician orders. Despite this, her quarterly MDS did not indicate she was on hospice care. Staff interviews again confirmed that this was an oversight and that the MDS should have been coded to reflect the resident's hospice status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙