Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Incontinence Care

Grantsboro, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-12-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Nurse Aide #1 and Nurse Aide #2 failed to follow the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy when providing incontinence care to Resident #14, who had a chronic sacral pressure ulcer. Both nurse aides performed hand hygiene and donned gloves but did not wear gowns, as required by the EBP policy for residents with wounds during high-contact care activities such as changing briefs. The aides believed that because there was no EBP signage or PPE on the door and the wound appeared to be covered with a preventative dressing, enhanced precautions were not necessary. Observation revealed that Resident #14 had a clean, dry border foam dressing on the sacrum, and the Infection Preventionist confirmed the presence of a chronic pressure ulcer with a small opening and no drainage. The Infection Preventionist stated she did not believe EBP was needed due to the wound's size and lack of drainage. However, the Director of Nursing later clarified that EBP should have been implemented for the resident due to the chronic wound, and appropriate signage and PPE should have been in place to alert staff.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙