Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive, Individualized Care Plans

Jacksonville, North Carolina Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement and develop comprehensive, individualized care plans for several residents in key areas, as observed and documented by surveyors. One resident with severe cognitive impairment and functional limitations was dependent on staff for all transfers and mobility, with a care plan specifying daily use of a Geri chair. Despite this, repeated observations over several days showed the resident remained in bed, and staff interviews revealed that nurse aides either did not follow the care plan, were unaware of its requirements, or did not prioritize the intervention due to other tasks or lack of equipment in the room. The resident's responsible party confirmed that the resident was not regularly assisted into the Geri chair as intended. Another resident with a PEG feeding tube had a physician's order for regular tube flushes and received a significant portion of daily fluid intake via the tube. However, the care plan did not address the use of the feeding tube, despite the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment triggering a Care Area Assessment (CAA) for feeding tube use. Both the dietary manager and the DON acknowledged that the feeding tube should have been included in the care plan, but it was omitted without explanation. Additionally, two residents using noninvasive mechanical ventilators (BiPAP and CPAP machines) for respiratory conditions did not have their device usage reflected in their care plans. In both cases, the residents were observed using the devices, and staff confirmed their ongoing use. However, there were no corresponding physician orders or care plan interventions for these devices. MDS nurses responsible for care planning admitted to missing these interventions, either due to reliance on memory or because the care planning system did not automatically prompt for respiratory care based on MDS coding. The DON and administrator confirmed that these omissions were contrary to expected practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙