Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Lack of Documentation for New Mental Illness Diagnosis with Antipsychotic Use

Durham, North Carolina Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate documentation supporting a newly diagnosed mental illness for a resident who was prescribed an antipsychotic medication. The resident, who had a history of stroke and depression, was readmitted and later assessed by a psychiatric nurse practitioner (NP) who noted auditory hallucinations and continued Risperdal, but did not document the basis for a new bipolar disorder diagnosis. The order for Risperdal was entered for bipolar disorder, but the supporting evaluation or rationale for this diagnosis was missing from the medical record. Subsequent psychiatric assessments referenced the bipolar disorder diagnosis, but the origin and justification for the diagnosis were unclear, and the diagnosis appeared to be automatically generated in documentation without direct clinical substantiation. Interviews with psychiatric NPs, the pharmacist, and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the new diagnosis was not communicated to the DON, and there was no evidence that the diagnosis was properly assessed or documented. The pharmacist relied on the presence of the diagnosis in the order without further verification, and the DON was unaware of the new diagnosis, which prevented appropriate updates to the resident's medical record and notifications to relevant staff. The annual MDS assessment also indicated the use of an antipsychotic without a documented attempt at gradual dose reduction or a clinical contraindication, further highlighting the lack of comprehensive documentation and communication regarding the resident's mental health status and medication management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙