Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
E

Failure to Ensure Accurate and Consistent Weight Monitoring and Documentation

Middletown, New York Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of leukemia, peripheral vascular disease, and transient ischemic attack did not receive care in accordance with professional standards regarding weight monitoring and documentation. Upon admission, the resident's weight was recorded as 89.4 lbs, but the following day, an LPN entered a weight of 113 lbs into the electronic medical record without notifying the physician of the significant discrepancy or requesting a reweigh. The initial admission weight was inactivated in the electronic record, making it inaccessible to other staff and absent from the nutritional assessment. Subsequent weights were inconsistently documented, with unclear dates and missing entries in both the weight book and electronic health record. The facility's policy required that any weight change of 5% or more be retaken the next day for confirmation, and that the dietitian review the weight record. However, there was no evidence that the dietitian addressed the admission weight discrepancy or the significant weight fluctuations in a timely manner. The dietitian relied on the 113 lbs value, disregarding the resident's report of a usual body weight under 100 lbs and the appearance of being underweight. When a later weight of 91.8 lbs was recorded, it was not promptly reweighed or entered into the assessment, and the dietitian continued to use the previous higher weight in documentation and care planning. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent practices and lack of communication regarding weight monitoring. Certified Nurse Aides did not consistently document dates or initials for weights, and the process for reviewing and entering weights into the electronic record was unclear among nursing, dietary, and administrative staff. The medical director was not notified of significant weight changes and was unaware of missing or inaccurate weights in the resident's record. The lack of consistent, accurate, and timely weight monitoring and documentation led to the resident not receiving care in accordance with their needs and professional standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙