Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment of Resident's Cognitive and Communication Status

Syracuse, New York Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

Fine: $158,555
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, resulting in documentation that did not reflect the resident's true cognitive and communication abilities. The resident, who had a history of mouth and throat cancer with a tracheostomy and absence of larynx, was documented in the most recent MDS as nonverbal and severely cognitively impaired. However, multiple observations and interviews revealed that the resident was able to communicate effectively using a speaking valve and was cognitively intact, as confirmed by staff, the resident's significant other, and the resident themselves. The care plan and MDS documentation did not include the resident's use of a speaking valve, and the cognitive assessment was not updated quarterly as required. Staff interviews indicated that the social worker typically carried over the initial cognitive assessment without reassessment, and the MDS coordinator was unaware that the resident's cognition had not been reassessed since admission. The business office notary relied on the inaccurate MDS cognitive score to deny notary services, believing the resident was significantly cognitively compromised. Further, the MDS coordinator and other staff relied on previous documentation and care plans, which perpetuated the inaccuracies in the resident's assessment. The speech language pathologist and other staff confirmed the resident's cognitive abilities and communication skills, but these were not reflected in the official assessments. The lack of accurate and updated assessments led to a misrepresentation of the resident's status in facility records.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙