Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0580
D

Delay in Physician Notification and Treatment for Pressure Ulcer

Arden Hills, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to immediately consult with a resident's physician regarding a significant change in the resident's condition, specifically the deterioration of a pressure ulcer. The resident, who had a history of atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease stage 3, spinal stenosis, and sarcoidosis, was noted to have a worsening sacral ulcer with redness, odor, and drainage. The medical director (MD) assessed the wound and recommended immediate hospital transfer for debridement. However, facility staff delayed this action, waiting for orders from the nurse practitioner (NP), who wanted to assess the wound personally the following day. This resulted in a delay of more than 24 hours before the resident was sent to the hospital, despite the MD's recommendation for urgent care. Interviews with facility staff revealed that it was protocol to obtain orders from the NP even when the MD had already given a recommendation for hospital transfer. The MD was not informed that the NP disagreed with his recommendation, and the facility administrator expressed a preference for direct hospital or wound clinic admission rather than emergency room transfer. The facility's policy required staff to notify practitioners of significant changes in a resident's condition, but this was not followed in a timely manner, leading to a delay in necessary treatment for the resident's rapidly deteriorating pressure ulcer.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙