Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0687
D

Failure to Provide Timely Podiatry Services and Diabetic Footwear

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that appropriate podiatry services were obtained for a resident with diabetes and neuropathy. The resident was identified as having a self-care deficit and required ongoing at-risk foot care, as documented in her care plan and podiatry notes. Despite a podiatry visit recommending continued care and a follow-up in nine to twelve weeks, no further podiatry appointments were scheduled for the resident over several months. The resident also reported being promised diabetic shoes, but no follow-up occurred, and her care plan lacked information regarding diabetic shoes or podiatry preferences. Multiple provider notes and orders indicated the need for podiatry referral and diabetic shoes, but these were not acted upon in a timely manner. Observations revealed the resident had long toenails, dry skin, edema, and reported foot pain, stating she could not wear her current shoes. Interviews with staff indicated confusion regarding the scheduling of podiatry appointments, with the health information manager unable to provide documentation of any refusal by the resident and the director of nursing noting a lapse in follow-up due to a change in guardianship. The facility was unable to provide a written policy for referrals, and the process described by the administrator was not followed in this case, resulting in the resident not receiving necessary podiatry care and diabetic shoes as ordered.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙