Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0697
D

Failure to Provide Safe and Appropriate Pain Management

St Charles, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate pain management for a newly admitted resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including heart failure, respiratory disease, several pressure ulcers, spinal and lumbar pain, adult failure to thrive, and urinary retention requiring a catheter. Upon admission, the resident's baseline care plan was not completed, and pain management needs, treatments, and goals were not assessed. Although the resident had physician orders for scheduled pain medications (Lyrica and acetaminophen), pain assessments were inconsistently completed, and non-pharmacological interventions were not documented or offered as required by facility policy. Throughout the resident's stay, documentation and direct observation revealed frequent and severe pain, with the resident repeatedly calling out and expressing that her pain was not being adequately managed. Staff interviews confirmed that non-pharmacological interventions, such as ice, heat, or distraction, were expected to be offered and documented, but these were not provided or recorded for the resident. The treatment administration record lacked evidence of attempted non-pharmacological pain interventions on multiple days, despite ongoing high pain scores and vocal complaints from the resident. Interviews with nursing staff and the assistant director of nursing indicated an awareness of the resident's persistent pain and the expectation to address pain within 15-20 minutes of notification, using both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. However, the resident's record showed that these expectations were not met, as non-pharmacological interventions were neither offered nor documented, and pain assessments were incomplete for one of the prescribed medications. Facility policy required staff to recognize, evaluate, and manage pain, but these steps were not consistently followed for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙