Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0697
D

Failure to Appropriately Monitor and Assess Pain Complaints

Hastings, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to appropriately monitor and comprehensively assess pain complaints for a resident with a complex pain history. The resident had diagnoses including fibromyalgia, chronic pain, diabetes, neuropathy, restless leg syndrome, depression, and psychotic disorder, and was prescribed both scheduled and PRN pain medications, as well as non-pharmacological interventions. The resident's care plans and assessments indicated frequent pain that affected sleep and daily activities, and the resident was able to verbalize pain and pain relief. Despite these interventions, documentation and monitoring of pain were inconsistent. Review of the resident's medication administration records and progress notes revealed that pain ratings and pain locations were often missing when PRN pain medications were administered. Specifically, several instances were noted where pain ratings or locations were not documented, and there was a lack of follow-up after pain medication administration. Additionally, the resident reported ongoing severe pain, rating it as eight or nine out of ten, and stated that pain medications were not effective and that nurses did not return to reassess pain after administration. Staff interviews confirmed that pain assessments were not always completed or documented as required, and follow-up on resident complaints was lacking. The facility's pain management policy required ongoing pain assessment, documentation of pain characteristics, and monitoring the effectiveness of interventions. However, the records showed that pain assessments were not consistently performed or documented, and there was insufficient evidence of comprehensive pain monitoring. This failure to follow policy and ensure thorough pain assessment and documentation led to the deficiency identified during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙