Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Ensure Ongoing Medical Justification and Assessment for Indwelling Catheter Use

Faribault, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident with an indwelling catheter had ongoing medical justification for its use and did not attempt a trial removal as recommended. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with toileting and bathing, was admitted with a catheter in place. Although the resident's diagnoses included several conditions that could potentially justify catheter use, the electronic medical record did not document the duration of urinary retention, any attempts to manage the condition without a catheter, or clear medical justification for continued catheterization. There was also no evidence of post void residual measurements to assess the extent of urine retention. Additionally, a urology note indicated a plan for a suprapubic catheter placement, but the record lacked follow-up on this order. Interviews with the resident and nursing staff revealed that the catheter had been in place since admission, primarily to prevent urine leakage during travel, and that no attempts had been made to remove it or reassess the need for ongoing catheterization. The facility's policy addressed catheter care procedures but did not address the need for ongoing assessment or justification for continued use.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙