Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Reassess and Update Interventions After New Pressure Injury

Faribault, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to comprehensively reassess and develop proactive interventions after a new pressure injury was identified in a resident with multiple medical conditions, including heart failure, hypertension, and multiple sclerosis. The resident was already at risk for pressure injuries and had an existing stage IV pressure ulcer that developed after admission. Despite the development of a new stage III pressure injury, there was no documented evidence of a comprehensive reassessment or updated interventions in the medical record. The care plan and interventions were not revised until after the survey began, and the required skin evaluation form was left incomplete. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident was largely independent in her care decisions, often refusing repositioning and other recommended interventions. Staff described the resident as dismissive and resistant to care, with a preference for remaining in bed and limited time spent in her wheelchair. Although the interdisciplinary team (IDT) discussed the resident's wounds and care plan, there was a lack of documentation regarding what interventions were considered, offered, or refused, especially after the new wound developed. The IDT notes provided were undated and lacked specific details about the reassessment process or any new interventions implemented. The facility's policy required a pressure ulcer risk assessment and completion of a skin evaluation form upon significant change, but the policy did not provide clear guidance on how a comprehensive reassessment should be conducted or documented. The director of nursing acknowledged that the medical record lacked evidence of a comprehensive reassessment and that proper documentation was important for continuity of care. The absence of a thorough reassessment and documentation following the development of a new pressure injury constituted the deficiency identified by surveyors.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙