Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care and Comprehensive Care Planning

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a comprehensive incontinence care plan and timely assistance with toileting for a resident with a history of mixed incontinence, orthopedic aftercare following hip replacement, pressure ulcer, and muscle weakness. The resident was identified as always incontinent of urine and bowel, requiring substantial to maximum assistance for lower body dressing and supervision or touching assistance for toilet transfers. Despite these needs, the resident's care plan did not include an incontinence care plan, and no bladder/bowel incontinence assessment was found in the medical record. Multiple observations revealed that the resident repeatedly activated the call light requesting assistance to be changed out of a wet pad and to get dressed, but staff responses were delayed. On one occasion, the resident waited over two hours before being assisted by an LPN, after initially being told by a nursing assistant that help would arrive soon. The resident expressed frustration about being left in a wet pad for extended periods and reported that this occurred almost daily, with staff often providing excuses or not entering the room promptly. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident's requests for assistance were delayed due to staffing limitations, with only one nursing assistant assigned to the hallway at the time. The DON acknowledged that staff should enter the room when a call light is activated and that residents should not have to wait over an hour for toileting or dressing assistance, nor be left in a wet pad for two hours. The facility's own policy requires timely assessment and individualized management of incontinence, which was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙