Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Medication Administration

Saint Paul, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for a resident during their annual assessment. The assessment indicated the resident had limited upper extremity range of motion, was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses including renal insufficiency, amputation, diabetes, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. The MDS section N0415 documented that the resident was taking an antidepressant and an antibiotic, but did not indicate that the resident was also receiving an anticoagulant, despite this being the case during the assessment period. During an interview, the DON confirmed that the resident did receive an anticoagulant during the MDS review period, but this was not reflected in the assessment. The DON acknowledged the importance of MDS accuracy for both payment and care planning. The facility's policy on MDS error correction outlines procedures for correcting both minor and major errors, depending on the impact on the resident's clinical status and care plan.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙