Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Respond Timely to Resident Grievances and Preferences

Midland, Michigan Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to respond in a timely manner to resident concerns for two residents regarding food preferences, meal quality, and ambulation assistance. One resident, who had a history of traumatic brain injury, cognitive communication deficit, and cancer with significant weight loss, reported ongoing dissatisfaction with the meals provided, including issues with food type, temperature, and lack of dietary accommodations. The resident and his wife stated they had complained almost daily since admission but were unaware of how to file a formal concern. The dietary manager was not aware of the resident's food preferences, and the required paperwork was found incomplete in the resident's room. Additionally, requests to eat in the dining room and be out of bed for meals were not communicated to the care staff, and no concern forms were completed or provided for these ongoing complaints. Another resident with dementia, depression, and mobility difficulties requested, along with her family, to be walked to the bathroom daily instead of being transported in a wheelchair. Although the care plan indicated she required only one-person assistance with a walker and therapy notes confirmed her ability to ambulate with minimal help, the facility denied the request, citing safety concerns without documented justification. The DON was unable to locate any risk/benefit analysis or documentation supporting the decision to refuse the resident's request, nor were any concern forms found to address the resident's or family's repeated concerns. In both cases, the facility did not provide evidence of a timely or effective response to resident grievances, failed to document or communicate resident preferences and concerns, and did not ensure that residents and their families were informed about the grievance process. These actions resulted in the residents' needs and preferences not being addressed as required by facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙