F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
D

Failure to Complete SCSA MDS After Development of Pressure Ulcers

Pinnacle Care Of Battle CreekBattle Creek, Michigan Survey Completed on 05-12-2025

Summary

The facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident who experienced a notable decline in health status. The resident, who had a history of vascular dementia, wheelchair dependence, and diabetes, was observed multiple times without a seating cushion in their wheelchair and was later found lying in bed. Medical records indicated the development of two facility-acquired stage II pressure ulcers in the left intergluteal region and posterior scrotum, which were still present and unhealed upon assessment by a nurse practitioner. Despite the emergence of these new stage II pressure ulcers, which meets the criteria for a significant change in status, the MDS Registered Nurse reported that a SCSA MDS was not conducted and was unaware of the pressure ulcers. The nurse also stated that SCSA MDS assessments were typically done for hospice admissions or discharges, not for pressure ulcers, and believed it was at the facility's discretion to conduct them for other changes. This lack of assessment resulted in the absence of a care plan revision to address the resident's new pressure ulcers.

Plan Of Correction

F637 - Comprehensive Assessment After Significant Change Element #1: The MDS Coordinator completed the significant change assessment for R11. The resident's care plan was reviewed and revised based on updated assessment data. R11 was assessed by the Director of Nursing and/or designee to ensure no lasting effects related to the incomplete significant change assessment. Element #2: The MDS Coordinator and/or designee initiated a review of current residents with recent hospitalizations, new diagnoses, or care plan changes in the last 30 days to identify if additional significant change assessments were warranted. Assessments will be initiated based on results of the 100% audit. Element #3: The Administrator reviewed the regulation F637. Licensed Nurses and Department Managers were provided education on significant change assessments, and the guidelines for F637. Element #4: The MDS Coordinator and/or designee will review weekly nursing reports and change-of-condition documentation to identify any missed significant change triggers for 12 weeks. Results of the audits will be brought to the QAPI Committee monthly for review. Any changes to the auditing process will be determined by the QAPI Committee. The Administrator is responsible to attain and maintain compliance. Compliance Date: 6/20/2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Resources

Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:

See other F0637 citations
Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS Assessment
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

Failure to Complete Significant Change MDS Assessment: A resident with dementia, progressive neurological conditions, and seizure disorder had an admission MDS that coded no mobility device use and independence with ADLs, but later was observed ambulating with a walker and gait belt. Quarterly MDSs still did not code walker use and showed increased ADL assistance needs, yet no comprehensive or significant change MDS had been completed. MDS coordinators said they were unaware of the walker use, believed the resident likely should not have been coded as independent, and confirmed the significant change MDS was missed.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Delayed Significant Change MDS Completion
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

The facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS within the required timeframe for a resident with diabetes and COPD who was admitted to hospice. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the assessment was completed after the 14-day deadline.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Late MDS SCSA After Hospice Election
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

The facility failed to complete an MDS SCSA within the required timeframe after a resident elected hospice. The resident’s hospice services began and the SCSA was completed late, and the MDS Coordinator acknowledged the assessment was probably completed after the 14-day window. CMS RAI guidance requires a SCSA when a terminally ill resident enrolls in hospice and remains in the facility.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Complete Significant Change Assessments After Fractures
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

The facility failed to complete SCSA MDS assessments within 14 days for two residents after fractures were identified. One resident with dementia, osteoporosis, AFib, HTN, and depression had a right fibular fracture after a foot/ankle injury, and another resident with dementia, TIA history, stroke history, hypothyroidism, and bilateral above-the-knee amputations had a left elbow fracture. The DON could not provide a policy or documentation for when and how a significant change assessment is completed, and the DON and an LPN confirmed the assessments were not done.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Delayed Significant Change Assessment for Hospice Election
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

Delayed Significant Change Assessment for Hospice Election: A resident with cancer elected hospice, but the facility did not complete the SCSA within the required 14-calendar-day timeframe. The MDSC stated she did not know the assessment had to be completed within 14 days, and the DON believed they had 2 weeks to complete a significant change for hospice. The facility policy listed the MDS completion date as the 14th calendar day after determination of significant change in status.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Failure to Complete Timely Significant Change Assessment
D
F0637 F637: Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Short Summary

Failure to complete timely significant change assessment: A resident with Alzheimer's disease, stroke, DM2, dysphagia, depression, heart disease, and dementia with agitation had a 5.15% weight loss in one week and developed a stage III pressure ulcer on the bilateral buttocks after an MDS showed no significant weight change and no unhealed pressure ulcers. The ADON stated she was unaware of any IDT discussions about whether a Significant Change MDS should have been completed before hospice was initiated.

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.
Citation search

Search every citation & Plan of Correction

Go to search
Citation watch

Track new serious citations across Michigan

Get a heads-up on the newest immediate-jeopardy (J–L) citations in Michigan — where surveyors are focused right now.

Free · about one email a month

Trusted data from CMS and state health departments

Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.

In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.

The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.

Get the Survey-Prep Report
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Connection lost — reconnecting… We couldn't reconnect automatically. Please reload the page to continue.