Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Failure to Ensure Accurate MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents

Ferndale, Michigan Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $70,1109 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four out of thirteen residents reviewed. In one case, a resident was incorrectly coded as being discharged to a short-term general hospital, when documentation showed the resident was actually transferred to another long-term care facility. The MDS Coordinator admitted this was an accidental error during the assessment process. Another resident's MDS assessment inaccurately indicated that a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic medication had occurred, including an incorrect date. Review of psychiatric evaluations and clinical records showed that no GDR was indicated or performed, and the date referenced did not correspond to any actual evaluation. The MDS Coordinator misunderstood the process, believing a GDR was performed with every psychiatric evaluation, and did not verify the information. A third resident's weight records showed significant fluctuations, but the MDS assessment did not accurately reflect these changes, nor was there documentation verifying the accuracy of the weights or actions taken to confirm them. The MDS Coordinator stated she only signed off on the assessments and did not verify the calculations, relying on dietary staff for accuracy. In another case, a resident was incorrectly coded as having a stage 3 pressure ulcer on admission, based on transfer documentation from another facility, without physical verification or accurate assessment by qualified staff. Interviews with nursing and administrative staff confirmed that the resident did not have a stage 3 pressure ulcer after admission, and the MDS Coordinator relied solely on previous records rather than current clinical findings.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙