Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Assess and Document Indwelling Catheter Use and Care

Ferndale, Michigan Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $70,1109 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when a resident admitted with an indwelling urinary catheter was not properly assessed for catheter removal, did not receive a follow-up with a urologist as ordered, and lacked physician orders for catheter care. The resident, who had a history of brain cancer, dementia, recent hospitalization, and multiple other medical conditions, was observed on several occasions with a Foley catheter in place. Despite the presence of the catheter, there were no corresponding physician orders for its use or care documented in the resident's medical record since admission. Review of the resident's hospital discharge summary did not reveal a diagnosis of urinary retention or any urologist consultation, even though the facility's records listed urinary retention as a diagnosis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and care area documentation did not provide a clinical rationale for the ongoing use of the indwelling catheter, and the section supporting the use of the Foley catheter was left blank. Additionally, a physician's note recommended a urology follow-up, but there was no evidence that this follow-up occurred. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN and the DON, confirmed that there were no physician orders for the catheter and that staff were unaware of this omission. The facility's own policy requires that indwelling catheters be used only when clinically necessary, with appropriate documentation, physician orders, and ongoing assessment, none of which were present in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙