Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Address and Document Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review Recommendations

Quincy, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 04-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations made by the consultant pharmacist were addressed in a timely manner and maintained as part of the permanent medical record for two residents. For one resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the consultant pharmacist recommended that instructions be added to the physician's order for Trelegy Ellipta inhaler to rinse the mouth after use to prevent oral thrush. This recommendation, made in February, was not addressed by the physician, and there was no documentation in the medical record indicating that the recommendation had been acted upon. For another resident with dementia and anxiety, who had been receiving Seroquel since admission, the consultant pharmacist made multiple recommendations over several months. These included requests for a psychiatric consult to review the appropriateness of Seroquel, consideration of a gradual dose reduction, and clarification or update of the diagnosis associated with the medication. The responses to these recommendations were either incomplete, lacking a rationale for continued use, or not documented at all. The diagnosis for Seroquel was eventually changed from sleep to depression, but there was no documentation in the medical record to indicate that the pharmacist's recommendations from August or January had been addressed. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the process for addressing and documenting MRR recommendations was not consistently followed. The Unit Manager and DON acknowledged that recommendations were not always completed or uploaded into the electronic medical record as required, and the consultant pharmacist reported that his recommendations were not routinely addressed or documented by his next visit, as expected by facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙