Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
E

Failure to Ensure Resident Access to and Resolution of Grievances

Taunton, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 05-13-2025

Penalty

Fine: $342,260
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that residents were able to voice and formulate grievances, have those grievances responded to promptly, and be provided with a resolution. During a facility tour, the surveyor was unable to find information about the grievance process posted in resident care areas, and the only information available was in the main lobby, which was not accessible to all residents. Review of the grievance binder showed the last grievance was resolved over a month prior to the survey, and during a resident group meeting, residents reported not seeing any postings about the grievance process and not knowing how to file a grievance except by reporting to staff. Residents also expressed uncertainty about the location of grievance forms and the identity of the grievance officer. Interviews with facility staff revealed confusion regarding the grievance process and the identity of the grievance officer. The Administrator, who had been in the role for about a month, was unsure about the previous process and stated that the social worker was responsible for grievances, while the social worker indicated that the Administrator was the grievance officer. The Activities Director was also unsure who the grievance officer was or who was responsible for providing updates and resolutions. The Ombudsman reported that concerns and grievances were submitted to administration but was not informed of any updates or resolutions, and residents she communicated with also did not receive updates on their reported concerns.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙