Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
E

Failure to Conduct Thorough Abuse Investigations

Walkersville, Maryland Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct thorough investigations into multiple allegations of abuse involving four residents. In several cases, required documentation such as real-time nurse progress notes, risk management assessments, and notifications to key administrative staff were missing from the electronic health record. Investigations often lacked essential components, including timely and complete interviews with involved parties and witnesses, as well as proper documentation of the investigative process. In one instance, a staff member accused of abuse had not received post-incident training, and there was no evidence of a psychological evaluation or care plan update for the resident involved. In another case, the investigation file was incomplete and inaccurate, with missing dates and times for interviews and a lack of follow-up on staff admissions regarding the incident. The investigation did not include necessary assessments such as skin and pain evaluations for the resident, nor did it provide evidence of post-incident staff education or referral to psychological services. The facility's documentation also failed to address the resident's chronic pain and polyarthritis, which were relevant to the allegation. Additional deficiencies included delayed or absent interviews with potential witnesses, such as a roommate who was not promptly interviewed despite being cognitively intact and available. In several investigations, the rationale for not substantiating abuse was based on residents' confusion or inconsistent accounts, rather than a comprehensive review of all available evidence. These actions and omissions resulted in incomplete investigations that did not meet the facility's stated standards for responding to abuse allegations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙