Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Required Discharge Notification

Woodburn, Kentucky Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide a written notice of discharge to a resident or their representative, as well as to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman, following the resident's discharge to home. The resident had been admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and inflammation of the hand, and was assessed to have intact cognitive function. Documentation in the electronic medical record included a discharge plan, but there was no evidence that the required discharge notification paperwork was given to the resident or sent to the Ombudsman. During the investigation, it was found that the facility could not produce the relevant transfer/discharge policy in effect at the time due to ownership changes. Interviews with facility leadership indicated that discharge planning and notifications were typically documented and provided, but in this case, there was no record of the required written notifications. The Ombudsman also confirmed not receiving any discharge notice for the resident. The facility administrator acknowledged the responsibility to notify both the resident's family and the Ombudsman, and noted that records should be retained and accessible, but was unsure of the specific retention period.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙