Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Ensure Resident Privacy and Dignity During Personal Care

Seneca, Kansas Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Staff failed to provide dignified and private care to multiple residents during personal care activities. For one resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and Down's syndrome, staff provided incontinent care and changed briefs without closing the privacy curtain or window blinds, leaving the resident exposed to the exterior patio and walkway. The resident was also observed in the dining room with her shirt open, exposing her left side. Staff acknowledged that a blanket was sometimes used to cover the resident due to arm movements that could expose her skin. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and a history of behavioral issues was assisted with toileting by two CNAs. Although staff reassured the resident about privacy, they failed to close the window drapes or shades in the bathroom, which was in direct line of sight from the exterior walkway and courtyard. The resident expressed concern about being undressed in public, but staff proceeded without ensuring full privacy. A third resident received suprapubic catheter care in her room with the blinds half up, allowing visibility from other resident rooms. Staff exposed the resident's lower abdomen and performed catheter care without closing the blinds. In each case, the facility's own dignity policy required staff to treat residents with respect and provide care in a manner that maintains or enhances quality of life, including ensuring privacy during personal care. Administrative staff confirmed that the expectation was for staff to provide privacy during such activities.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙