Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter and Wound Care

Hampton, Iowa Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices during urinary catheter care and wound care for two residents. In the first instance, a resident with a neurogenic bladder and an indwelling urinary catheter required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to the presence of a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) and pressure wounds. The care plan specifically directed staff to wear a gown and gloves during high-contact care activities, including catheter care. However, during an observed catheter care procedure, a certified nursing aide did not wear a gown as required, despite being aware of the EBP protocol. In the second case, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, a history of progressive neurological conditions, and a pressure ulcer was also under EBP for a chronic wound. The care plan instructed staff to wear a gown and gloves during high-contact care activities, including wound care. During an observed wound care procedure, an LPN performed the treatment without wearing a gown, even though the care plan still listed EBP as an active intervention. The LPN believed EBP was no longer necessary due to the wound's condition, but the care plan had not yet been updated to reflect this change. Both incidents were confirmed through staff interviews and direct observation. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that staff were expected to follow EBP protocols as outlined in the care plans and facility policy, which required gown and glove use for residents with indwelling devices or chronic wounds. The failure to adhere to these protocols resulted in the identified deficiencies.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙