Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0676
E

Failure to Provide and Document Restorative Care for Residents

Sioux City, Iowa Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide and document restorative care for four residents who were identified as needing such services to maintain their activities of daily living (ADLs). Each resident had documented diagnoses such as muscle wasting, weakness, unsteadiness, repeated falls, or stroke, and their care plans included restorative programs to maintain or improve their functional abilities. Despite these documented needs and care plans, restorative care was either not provided as scheduled or was provided infrequently, as evidenced by restorative care flow records and weekly reviews showing little to no restorative care delivered over a 15-day period. Resident interviews confirmed the lack of restorative care, with residents reporting that they only received therapy or restorative interventions once or twice a week, or not at all. Some residents expressed concern about the potential for loss of function due to the lack of regular restorative therapy. Family members also voiced dissatisfaction, noting that the restorative program was not being implemented as expected and expressing concern about the residents' declining abilities. Staff interviews revealed that the restorative aide was frequently reassigned to direct resident care due to staffing shortages, preventing her from performing restorative duties. The DON acknowledged that restorative care was not consistently provided, attributing this to staff turnover and the need to reallocate the restorative aide to cover other care needs. The facility's own policy required that residents receive restorative nursing care as needed to promote optimal safety and independence, but this was not followed for the residents reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙