Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
D

Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Insulin Administration

Fort Madison, Iowa Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that insulin was administered according to physician orders for two residents with diabetes. For one resident, the physician order specified that insulin should be held if blood sugar was less than 150, yet there were eighteen documented instances where insulin was administered despite blood sugar readings below this threshold. The resident's care plan indicated diabetes management with medication as ordered, and the MARs showed repeated administration of insulin when blood sugar was less than 150. Staff interviews revealed that nursing staff did not consistently follow the parameters set by the physician order, with one RN stating disbelief in the necessity of the parameters and another indicating that administration was based on dietary intake rather than the specified blood sugar threshold. For the second resident, the physician order also required insulin to be held if blood sugar was less than 150, but the MARs documented multiple instances over several months where insulin was given despite blood sugar readings below this level. Staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness or understanding of the parameters for insulin administration, with some staff believing that only certain residents had such parameters. The Director of Nursing and Administrator confirmed that there was no facility policy addressing medication administration in these circumstances. Both residents had documented cognitive impairments and required insulin injections as part of their diabetes management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙