Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
D

Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Resident Care

Dunlap, Iowa Survey Completed on 05-22-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices for two residents who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to the presence of indwelling medical devices and wounds. For one resident with a stage 2 pressure ulcer not present on admission, staff were observed performing transfers and wound care without donning gowns, despite completing hand hygiene and glove use. Both the RN/ADON and DON provided conflicting statements regarding the necessity of EBP for this resident, with the DON stating EBP should be used for residents with draining wounds or external devices, but ultimately EBP was not applied during care. Another resident with a Foley catheter and a feeding tube, who was totally dependent on staff for care, also did not receive EBP during high-contact activities. During a procedure involving the disconnection and flushing of the feeding tube, the RN failed to wear gloves or a gown, and interacted directly with the resident. Facility policy required EBP for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of known infection or colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms, but this was not followed during the observed care activities.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙