Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor Resident's Right to Communication and Self-Determination

Marion, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination and communication. A resident with cerebral palsy, obsessive-compulsive disorder, mild intellectual disabilities, fibromyalgia, and mobility impairments was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and was cognitively moderately impaired. The resident was unable to reposition herself or independently contact her family and relied on staff for assistance. The Administrator and Social Services spoke with the resident about her frequent phone calls to her family member, instructing her that she could not be on the phone during care and that all electronic devices would be shut off while care was provided. The stated reason was to protect the resident's privacy and dignity, and staff would assist the resident in resuming the call after care was completed. Despite the resident and her family member expressing a desire to remain connected by phone, even during care, the facility enforced the policy of disconnecting calls during care. The resident's family member indicated that being on the phone was necessary to help the resident communicate, as she was sometimes difficult to understand. Staff interviews confirmed that the family member was frequently on speaker phone during care, and some staff were not bothered by this, suggesting alternatives such as muting the call or lowering the volume. The facility did not have a policy addressing resident phone usage during care, and the local Ombudsman had suggested hanging up the phone during care for privacy reasons.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙