Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Documentation of Resident Code Status

Cloverdale, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-06-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's code status was consistently documented across the physician order, care plan, and POST (Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) form. Record review revealed that the physician order indicated the resident was a full code, while the most recent POST form and care plan documented the resident as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The resident had a history of Huntington's Disease, anxiety, and dysphagia, and was noted to be cognitively impaired according to a recent MDS assessment. Interviews with facility staff confirmed the inconsistency, with the Administrator acknowledging that the POST form was correct and the physician order was incorrect. An LPN stated that the resident's code status changed frequently and updates were recorded in the medical record, but did not address the discrepancy between documents. Facility policy required that physician orders be specific and address each advanced directive, but this was not followed in the resident's case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙