Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents

Ellettsville, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, dementia, and mood disorder, the clinical record showed a PASARR Level II determination for serious mental illness. However, the annual MDS assessment did not indicate the resident as PASARR Level II, as section A1500 was incorrectly marked 'no.' The Clinical Reimbursement Director confirmed this was an error and acknowledged the absence of a specific MDS assessment coding policy, relying instead on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. For another resident with diagnoses including heart disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and dementia, the clinical record indicated the resident was receiving hospice services. Despite this, the quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect hospice care in section O0110. The Clinical Reimbursement Director confirmed that hospice services were being provided during the assessment period and that the MDS should have been marked accordingly. Both deficiencies were identified through record review and staff interview, with reference to the RAI manual for correct coding procedures.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙