Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

Failure to Adequately Monitor Antipsychotic Medication with Timely AIMS Assessments

South Bend, Indiana Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to adequately monitor the use of an antipsychotic medication for a resident diagnosed with bipolar disorder, among other conditions. The resident was prescribed Aripiprazole to be taken six times weekly, and the care plan required quarterly AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessments to monitor for side effects. Despite pharmacy recommendations in August and September for an AIMS assessment, there was a significant delay, and the assessment was not completed until January of the following year. The care plan was updated to include quarterly AIMS assessments, but this intervention was not followed as required during the period in question. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in the understanding and monitoring of AIMS assessments. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated that the facility standard was to perform AIMS assessments every six months, despite the care plan specifying quarterly assessments. The Social Services Worker, responsible for care plan creation and monitoring, was unsure how AIMS assessment completion was being tracked. There was no written facility policy regarding the frequency of AIMS assessments for residents on antipsychotic medications.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙