Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Ensure Wanderguard Function and Documentation for At-Risk Resident

Logansport, Indiana Survey Completed on 04-28-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A dependent resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering was observed wearing a wanderguard bracelet on her right ankle. The resident was independently mobile, had diagnoses including dementia, and was assessed as being at risk for elopement. The care plan specified that the function and placement of the wanderguard sensor should be checked daily. However, there was no physician's order for the use of the wanderguard, and no documentation was found indicating that the placement or function of the wanderguard was checked between the beginning and end of the month. The MAR only reflected an order for the wanderguard starting late in the month, with checks not documented until several days after the order. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness regarding the presence of residents with wanderguard bracelets, and staff confirmed that an order and regular checks should have been in place and documented. The facility's policy required that residents at risk for elopement have interventions such as a wanderguard applied, with nursing staff responsible for checking placement each shift and function daily, documenting these checks on the treatment record. These required checks and documentation were not completed as outlined in the policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙