Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Document and Implement Dietary Interventions for At-Risk Resident

Monticello, Indiana Survey Completed on 05-19-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to fully implement care-planned dietary interventions for a resident at risk for weight loss. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, COPD, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, was severely cognitively impaired and required setup help for eating. Care plans required staff to record meal and fluid intake percentages and to offer a substitute if the resident consumed less than 50% of a meal. However, review of intake records over a one-month period showed multiple instances where the resident consumed 50% or less of meals, with no documentation that a supplement or substitute was offered. Additionally, there were several meals with no intake documentation at all. During an interview, the DON confirmed that staff were expected to document substitutes offered in the electronic record, but acknowledged that while substitutes were always available and offered, this was not documented. Facility policy required documentation of foods and fluids consumed at each meal, as well as documentation of substitute offerings and resident acceptance or refusal when intake was 50% or less. The lack of documentation for both meal intake and substitute offerings constituted a failure to follow the care plan and facility policy for this resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙