Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0745
D

Failure to Assist Resident with Transportation for Medically Necessary Eye Appointment

Palos Park, Illinois Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

Fine: $31,425
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with macular degeneration and impaired vision was not assisted by facility staff in obtaining transportation to a retinal specialist appointment, as ordered by the physician and recommended by an ophthalmologist. The resident reported having to cancel the appointment due to the high cost of transportation and stated that no alternative options, such as seeing the in-house eye doctor, were offered. Staff interviews confirmed that only one transportation company was contacted, and when the resident declined to pay the out-of-pocket cost, no further alternatives or education about other options were provided. Documentation did not reflect any education given to the resident regarding transportation responsibilities or any efforts to arrange alternative transportation. The facility's policy requires staff to arrange transportation for outside appointments unless the family chooses to do so, and to reschedule missed appointments at the earliest time. However, staff did not document any attempts to reschedule the appointment or offer other solutions after the resident declined to pay for the transportation. The care plan indicated the need for ongoing ophthalmology consults, but there was no evidence that the facility followed through with these interventions for the resident after the initial appointment was missed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙