Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
H

Failure to Provide Adequate Fall Prevention and Supervision for High-Risk Residents

Chicago, Illinois Survey Completed on 04-23-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that fall interventions and adequate supervision were in place for multiple residents identified as high risk for falls. Several residents, all with significant medical histories including dementia, unsteady gait, and previous falls, experienced unwitnessed or inadequately supervised falls that resulted in serious injuries such as femoral fractures, vertebral fractures, and lacerations. In multiple instances, residents were found on the floor by staff after the fact, and documentation revealed that required interventions, such as ensuring call lights were within reach, were not consistently implemented. For example, one resident was found on the floor with a laceration and a fractured right femur after attempting to ambulate unsupervised, with staff later confirming that the call light was not accessible and that the resident was known to walk independently despite being high risk. Interviews with staff and review of records indicated that high-risk residents were often left unsupervised or allowed to ambulate alone, despite care plans and assessments indicating the need for supervision. Staff statements confirmed that some residents, due to cognitive impairment and poor safety awareness, would attempt to walk or toilet themselves without assistance, and that supervision was not always provided. In several cases, staff were not present or were engaged in other tasks when falls occurred, and some staff were unclear about the specific supervision needs of the residents in their care. Additionally, the facility lacked a clear policy on resident supervision, and staff relied on informal communication or personal knowledge rather than standardized protocols. Documentation further showed inconsistencies in incident reporting and care plan implementation. For example, one resident's fall with injury was not accurately documented in the injury report, and another resident's care plan interventions, such as purposeful rounding and environmental safety measures, were not reliably followed. The facility's own records indicated a pattern of repeated falls among high-risk residents, with multiple incidents occurring over a short period. Despite the presence of care plans and fall risk assessments, the necessary interventions and supervision were not consistently provided, directly leading to multiple residents sustaining serious injuries.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙