Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility and Proper Staff Response

Chicago, Illinois Survey Completed on 05-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors found that staff failed to ensure call devices were within reach for two residents and did not consistently inquire about residents' needs when responding to call lights. In one instance, a resident's call device was found behind the nightstand and tangled, making it inaccessible. A Licensed Practical Nurse acknowledged the device was not within reach and corrected its placement. A Certified Nursing Assistant admitted not checking the call light's placement during the last room visit. In another case, a staff member responded to a call light by informing a resident about lunch but did not ask what assistance was needed before turning off the call light and leaving the room. Both residents involved had significant medical histories and cognitive impairments. One resident had a history of falls, hypertension, osteoporosis, and a moderate cognitive impairment, with care plans specifying the need for the call light to be within reach. The other resident had severe dementia, poor vision, and required substantial assistance with self-care, with a care plan identifying high fall risk and the need for safety measures. Facility policies and job descriptions require call lights to be within reach and staff to inquire about residents' needs, but these procedures were not followed in the observed incidents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙