Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Residents with Serious Mental Illness

Burley, Idaho Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents with serious mental illness diagnoses. For one resident admitted after a fracture with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, the medical record contained both a PASRR level I and an abbreviated PASRR level II screening, both identifying serious mental illness. However, the resident's Admission MDS Assessment incorrectly documented 'no' in section A1500, indicating the resident was not considered to have a serious mental illness or intellectual disability, despite the PASRR level II findings. Similarly, another resident with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder had a PASRR level I and an abbreviated PASRR level II screening, both confirming serious mental illness. While the MDS assessment initially reflected this, subsequent annual MDS assessments incorrectly marked 'no' in section A1500, failing to indicate the presence of a serious mental illness as determined by the PASRR level II screening. These inaccuracies were confirmed by the Regional MDS Nurse during staff interviews.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙