Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate Resident Assessments Related to Bedrail Use

American Falls, Idaho Survey Completed on 05-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the residents' status regarding the use of bedrails. For four residents, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded to indicate daily use of bedrails as restraints, despite documentation in care plans and side rail assessments that the bedrails were used for mobility, independence, or at the resident's discretion. In several cases, care plans and assessments noted that the bedrails were not used as restraints, and residents or their representatives were informed of the risks and had provided consent for their use. However, the MDS continued to be coded as if the bedrails were restraints. Staff interviews, including statements from the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Social Worker (LSW), confirmed that the MDS coding did not accurately reflect the actual use of bedrails for these residents. The DON stated that the coding was based on daily use of the side rails, not on whether they functioned as restraints, and expressed concern about falsifying records. This inconsistency between the MDS coding and the documented purpose and use of bedrails resulted in inaccurate assessments for the affected residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙