Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0880
E

Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Tracheostomy Care

Savannah, Georgia Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that respiratory staff followed infection control practices during tracheostomy care for a resident with a tracheostomy. According to the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy, staff are required to wear gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities, such as tracheostomy care, for residents with indwelling medical devices. Observation revealed that the respiratory nurse technician provided tracheostomy care to a resident who was dependent for activities of daily living and had multiple diagnoses, including respiratory failure, without wearing a gown as required by the EBP protocol. The technician wore only a mask and gloves during the procedure, despite signage on the resident's door indicating the need for both gown and gloves. Interviews with staff confirmed inconsistent understanding and implementation of the EBP requirements. The respiratory nurse technician stated that he wore a gown only for residents on contact isolation precautions, not for those on EBP, while another respiratory nurse technician and the Director of Nursing both indicated that a gown should be worn during tracheostomy care for residents on EBP. This inconsistency in following established infection control protocols led to the deficiency identified during the survey.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙