Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Document Rationale for Declining Pharmacist Medication Recommendations

Inverness, Florida Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the physician or prescriber documented the rationale for declining pharmacist recommendations during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for two residents who were receiving unnecessary medications. For one resident with a history of GERD, the pharmacist recommended a dose reduction of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and requested documentation of the necessity for continued use. The prescriber responded with 'No change' but did not provide a rationale for declining the recommendation, and the form lacked any explanation for the decision. In another instance, the pharmacist again recommended a review and possible reduction of the PPI, but the documentation was incomplete, with no length of time specified for continued therapy and no rationale provided for declining the recommendation. For a second resident, the pharmacist made recommendations regarding the use of multiple psychotropic medications, including the need for reassessment of PRN meclizine after 14 days and a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of psychotropic drugs as per federal guidelines. The prescriber responded with 'No change at this time after assessment: risk vs benefit,' but did not document any further information or rationale on the provided forms. Additionally, there were no progress notes addressing the use of meclizine or the symptoms it was prescribed for during the relevant months. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the DON managed the MRRs and did not request clarification or additional information if the provider marked a response. The ARNP involved stated that they were not initially educated about the requirement to provide an explanation when declining pharmacist recommendations. Review of the facility's policy confirmed that providers are required to document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what action, if any, has been taken, but this was not consistently done.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙