Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Document Rationale for Declining Pharmacist Medication Recommendations

Inverness, Florida Survey Completed on 04-30-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that physicians or prescribers documented the rationale for declining pharmacist recommendations regarding unnecessary medications for two residents. In both cases, the consultant pharmacist conducted monthly medication regimen reviews and made specific recommendations to reevaluate or discontinue certain medications due to potential risks or duplicative therapy. However, the physicians or nurse practitioner declined these recommendations without providing any documented rationale in the residents' medical records, despite signing the forms. For one resident, the pharmacist recommended reevaluating and possibly discontinuing nitrofurantoin, which had been used for urinary tract infection prophylaxis for several months, citing risks such as pulmonary fibrosis and hepatotoxicity. The physician declined the recommendation and signed the form but did not document any reason for this decision. In another case, a resident was receiving megestrol for appetite stimulation without a qualifying diagnosis, and the pharmacist recommended discontinuation due to limited benefit and potential adverse effects. The physician again declined without providing a rationale or signature. Additional recommendations to discontinue sucralfate and address duplicate beta-blocker therapy were also declined by the nurse practitioner without documented explanations. During an interview, the Director of Nursing confirmed that prescribers are expected to provide a rationale when declining pharmacist recommendations, but this was not done in these instances. Review of the facility's policy indicated that prescribers should document their rationale for rejecting pharmacist recommendations in the medical record, in accordance with CMS guidelines. The lack of documentation for the rationale behind declining these recommendations constituted the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙