Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Dialysis Status

San Diego, California Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one resident, resulting in the submission of incorrect information to the federal database. Specifically, the MDS for a resident admitted with cystitis was marked to indicate that the resident was receiving dialysis, despite no physician orders for dialysis, no evidence of a dialysis graft, and direct statements from the resident and assigned nurse confirming that dialysis was not being provided. The MDS nurse acknowledged that the assessment was coded inaccurately and emphasized the importance of MDS accuracy for care planning and facility reimbursement. Interviews with the resident, the assigned licensed nurse, the MDS nurse, and the Director of Nursing all confirmed that the resident was not on dialysis. Review of facility policy and the CMS Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual further supported the requirement for accurate MDS coding. The deficiency was identified through observation, interview, and record review, and was limited to one of seven sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙