Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Lapses in Supervision and Device Maintenance

Crescent City, California Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of traumatic brain injury, severe cognitive impairment, psychosis, anxiety, insomnia, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia was admitted to the facility and had documented elopement attempts since admission. The resident was assessed as high risk for elopement and had medical orders for a Wander Guard device and a sit-stand alarm, with staff instructed to check the Wander Guard placement every shift and to escort the resident to and from meals. Despite these interventions, the resident was left alone in the dining room after dinner while staff were escorting other residents, contrary to the protocol that required the resident to be taken first. During this time, the resident exited the facility through the front doors without staff assistance. Interviews revealed that the Wander Guard device did not alert due to an expired battery, and the sit-stand alarm did not activate because the resident had removed it from his jacket. The receptionist, who usually monitored the doors, was not present on the day of the incident, and there was uncertainty about door monitoring procedures on weekends. The resident was found outside the facility by neighbors, who notified staff. The facility's policy required staff to accompany wandering residents when supervision was necessary, but this was not followed, resulting in the resident's unsupervised exit.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙